`the Don`t-bother_to-knock Rule`

Running head : ETHICSEthicsClient s NameUniversity AffiliationEthicsThe honorable debate as to the correctitude of euthanasia , which was earlier known to be the good net stage had been going on for a long conviction (MedicineNet , Inc , 2007 . The groundbreaking concept of euthanasia now involves the participation of the physician in cutting short the behavior of a terminally unhealed patient . Sometimes such put throughs ar non tear down classified as euthanasia , and as a mere part of end point making in the health care lay outting , much particularly in terminal b keenistrys (MedicineNet , Inc , 2007 p The built in bed described by Stengle is one such vitrine , whe reign pulling the plug or removal of a individual s life embolden system is seen as the only stress to go (2006 . The terminal and hopeles s medical case of Daniel Wayne Cullen II led the hospital s ethics senesce to decide against stay on life declareIn this mooring , the common debate would revolve or so both positions : Kantian and consequentialist ethics . Between these two ethical theories , the Kantian position is more in advance of life , and is more in accord with humanityKantian moral philosophical system demands the grooming of the categorical imperative , which is the one moral dominion that would in the end guide all of man s counterfeit outions (The Internet encyclopedia of ism , 2001 Kantian philosophy does not look at the consequences of the operation , but at the occasion behind it (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2001 .On the other lot , consequentialist philosophy , or utlitarianism gauges human feat based on the happiness it brings or the pain it causes . Applied in the minded(p) situation , the special(a) number of people to be served by a decision to continue life ch eck would dictate secondion against it . On! the other hand , removing life support could bear several(prenominal) benefits , such as lessened expenses and non-wastage of hospital resources and spaceHowever , it is better to act based on discernment , and not based on the contingent allotment of happy feelings .

In the given situation , removing life support is ap spread outd because the ethics committee has trammel out standards to help them decide these kinds of situations . Thus , the ethics mount up had already determined medically that continued life support would be futile (Stengle , 2006The emotions of the mother would dictate that the consequences of the action be used as basis for decision-making , while the objective prove of view of the doctors dictates that the dilemma be resolved through apt weighing of benefits or outcomeThe latter course of action backside be formulated as a general rein in of action in all cases of similar expound . The action would be supported not by feelings and emotions , but by the acceptance that there is nothing in reason to support an action of continued life supportReferencesMedicineNet , Inc (2007 . Definition of euthanasia . Retrieved October 10 , 2007 , from http /www .medterms .com /script /main /art .asp ? holdkey 7365Stengle , J (2006 . Mom Fights to Keep Baby on Life appoint . The Christian Post . Retrieved October 10 , 2007 , from http /www .christianpost .com /article /22123...If you indirect request to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay